NEWSWEEK COVER: The Religious Case for Gay Marriage
  
In the December 15 issue of Newsweek (on newsstands December 8), "The Religious Case for Gay Marriage," Newsweek Religion Editor Lisa Miller writes that many opponents of same-sex marriage base their objections on Scripture, though the Bible gives no good reason why gays and lesbians should not be married - and a number of reasons why they should. Plus: a custody battle between two women; new battles over abortion; Bill Gates and education; Dubai's financial troubles; and the Science of Longevity. (PRNewsFoto/NEWSWEEK)
NEW YORK, NY UNITED STATES
Newsweek Poll Shows Two-Thirds of People Who See Gay Marriage as a Religious Matter Oppose it
"Religious Objections to Gay Marriage are Rooted Not in the Bible at All"
NEW YORK, Dec. 7 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- The latest Newsweek Poll shows
growing public support for gay marriage and civil unions, with a number of
factors playing a role in swaying people one way or the other. According to
the poll, 62 percent of Americans say religious beliefs play an important role
in shaping their views on gay marriage. "According to the survey, two-thirds
of those who see marriage as primarily a legal matter support gay marriage. On
the other hand, two-thirds of those who see it as mostly a religious matter
(or equal parts religious and legal) oppose gay marriage." Religion Editor
Lisa Miller examines this issue in the December 15 cover, "The Religious Case
for Gay Marriage" (on newsstands Monday, December 8), and writes that "not
since 1860, when the country's pulpits were full of preachers pronouncing on
slavery, pro and con, has one of our basic social (and economic) institutions
been so subject to Biblical scrutiny ... All the religious rhetoric, it
seems, has been on the side of the gay-marriage opponents, who use Scripture
as the foundation for their objections." A mature view of scriptural
authority requires the ability to move beyond literalism, as common practice
changes and evolves over time. "Religious objections to gay marriage are
rooted not in the Bible at all, then, but in custom and tradition," Miller
writes.
Miller writes that the argument against gay marriage involves the idea
that the Bible and Jesus define marriage as between one man and one woman, and
homosexuality is in opposition to Scripture. To which there are two obvious
responses: First, neither the Bible nor Jesus says any such thing. And second,
no sensible modern person wants marriage -- theirs or anyone else's -- to look
in its particulars anything like what the Bible describes. "'Marriage' in
America refers to two separate things, a religious institution and a civil
one, though it is most often enacted as a messy conflation of the two. As a
civil institution, marriage offers practical benefits to both partners:
contractual rights having to do with taxes; insurance; the care and custody of
children; visitation rights; and inheritance. As a religious institution,
marriage offers something else: a commitment of both partners before God to
love, honor, cherish each other -- in sickness and in health, for richer and
poorer -- in accordance with God's will." Miller argues that the Bible offers
no reason why gays and lesbians should not be married, in both civil and
religious terms -- and a number of excellent reasons why they should.
"We cannot look to the Bible as a marriage manual, but we can read it for
universal truths as we struggle toward a more just future," Miller writes.
"The Bible offers inspiration and warning on the subjects of love, marriage,
family and community. It speaks eloquently of the crucial role of families in
a fair society and the risks we incur to ourselves and our children should we
cease trying to bind ourselves together in loving pairs."
Also in the cover package, Senior Writer Lorraine Ali tells the story of a
custody battle between two women who were joined in a Vermont civil union.
Their relationship failed, one partner decided she was no longer gay and now
they're fighting for custody of the daughter they both love. The case, Miller
v. Jenkins, has important implications for gay parents everywhere.